Well 167 responses from a facebook group is hardly indicative of all people who participate in the CTC. Using slides in the CTC is hardly giving someone world domination for an event that has no prizes except bragging rights. Then again certain people I note of late, not in this forum, are fond of bragging rights. A bigger issue is surely the possibility of sprint kings/Queens using PED's.
It concerns me now, that I have also seen a push for not allowing virtual entries at WRIC in 2023. Unless they got a very large participation then is it really valid. There are still only 15 virtual spots and anyone that actually registers to go live and turns up can compete anyway. It would be prohibitively expensive for me to head north of the equator for such an event on a yearly basis. Once in a lifetime maybe.
My 2cents worth
About slides
Moderator: The forum police - (nee naw)
-
- Super Dedicated and Truly Free Spirit
- Posts: 2839
- Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 9:40 am
- I row on...: Model D with PM3
- Location: Ryde, IOW
Re: About slides
I'm not too fussed either way - I missed the vote but if pushed I would probably voted against slides - slides give an advantage over the short stuff and while I'm not competitive in the CTC there are those who are, and they would be disadvantaged on a standard set-up against those using slides - also there is limited access to slides for most of the erging population.
As I've said, it's a bit of a storm in a teacup, but I would rather see a level playing field.
Insofar as the Skierg goes, times are slower, and there is a separate team for SkiErgers in the CTC, so a non-issue in my eyes.
Two-thirds majority, even on a relatively small polled sample, is quite comprehensive.
Just my opinion.
Paul G
As I've said, it's a bit of a storm in a teacup, but I would rather see a level playing field.
Insofar as the Skierg goes, times are slower, and there is a separate team for SkiErgers in the CTC, so a non-issue in my eyes.
Two-thirds majority, even on a relatively small polled sample, is quite comprehensive.
Just my opinion.
Paul G
56, 1.74m , Sep '20 - 114 kg , currently - 98 kg
200m - 30.8
300m - 47.7
30r20 - 7754m
12 hr - 139300m
100 mile - 14:10.12
200km - 18:28.30
200m - 30.8
300m - 47.7
30r20 - 7754m
12 hr - 139300m
100 mile - 14:10.12
200km - 18:28.30
- Claudius
- Friend of the Free Spirits web site 2019
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:36 pm
- I row on...: Model D with PM5
- Location: Oberpfalz, Bavaria, Germany
Re: About slides
There was a reaction to the votes, I found this idea very reasonable, practicable and wise :
My personal view, in the interests of inclusivity, is that there should be exemptions for medical or other physical problems. Nobody who is going to feature in the top twenty, let's say, individuals on the leaderboard or occupy a top boat should use slides. I would hate to think that any regular CTC competitors in more lowly positions would feel excluded by this new rule. (from https://www.c2forum.com/viewtopic.php?f ... 10#p556488 )
My personal view, in the interests of inclusivity, is that there should be exemptions for medical or other physical problems. Nobody who is going to feature in the top twenty, let's say, individuals on the leaderboard or occupy a top boat should use slides. I would hate to think that any regular CTC competitors in more lowly positions would feel excluded by this new rule. (from https://www.c2forum.com/viewtopic.php?f ... 10#p556488 )
“Do you wish me a good morning, or mean that it is a good morning whether I want it or not; or that you feel good this morning; or that it is a morning to be good on?”
(J.R.R.T.)
-
- Rower and forum addict...
- Posts: 224
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2022 9:28 pm
- I row on...: Model D with PM5
- Location: San Francisco, California
Re: About slides
I like that approach - exclusivity should win except at the highest tier of competitiveness where I could see the importance of the “level playing field”.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk